You also have to go out of your way to set it up because its not included as part of a default install of any modern *nix operating system. It's a crappy insecure protocol, and people who use it don't know any better. I've worked in several environments where FTP is flat out banned (no, not NASA, not the CIA, normal environments). Current job I'm one of several responsible for over 1000 servers for reference.įTP is only used by organizations that don't know wtf they're doing. Given how fast you can set it up I think its worth the extra ducats. If I ever have to set them up anymore (and usually its for a simple https web file transfer station anymore-true FTP isn't so popular anymore, but the notion is) I go with Rumpus. It's a Java application and has some quirkiness in the layout that can make it pretty odd to follow. It is cheap though, but I'm not sure I'd call it better than the built-in given the interface. My experience with CrushFTP is more of an old Volvo-it works, but it has some odd design choices that make things a little odd all around, and it isn't always so easy to fix it when something goes wrong. a little convoluted, but completely functional. The PureFTP GUI is the next thing I'd take a look at. However, like a Caddy it's probably more than you need and more cash than you want to spend. 2 minutes to start it up, and it doesn't seem to ever crash.
#RUMPUS FTP FOR MAC FOR MAC#
Well, the Cadillac of FTP servers for Mac (that is smooth running with all the bells and whistles) is Rumpus. There are few options, but is there a reason the built-in isn't working for you? There really isn't a lot to FTP, and the built-in covers that pretty well (i.e.
0 kommentar(er)
